Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:01

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Seven years later, Nintendo fans beat Switch game even the devs didn’t - Polygon
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
When was the first time you suck on a penis?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump airs frustrations with Xi and Jerome Powell over elusive economic goals - NBC News
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Over 46,000 Grafana instances exposed to account takeover bug - BleepingComputer
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Do you enjoy cheating on your spouse? If so, why?
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What are some cool confidence hacks?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Scientists find that major Earth systems are on the verge of total collapse - Earth.com
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.